Mr Aliyu Abubakar, a co-defendant in the alleged cash laundering trial of the former Minister of Justice, Mohammed Adoke, on Wednesday, advised a Federal High Court, Abuja that he had no case to reply in the matter.
Abubakar’s counsel, Wole Olanipekun, SAN, made this regarded to Justice Inyang Ekwo throughout the adoption of the closing written addresses of events in the tria-within-trial after the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) closed its case.
Olanipekun, in his argument, stated that the extra-judicial statements acquired from his patron through the officers of the EFCC, such as Mr Bala Sanga, throughout investigation have been no longer made voluntarily.
He stated that the anti-graft enterprise admitted in their utility they filed that Sanga, the former prosecuting lawyer, used to be current all through the extraction of the statements.
He alleged that Sanga caused Abubakar to implicate Adoke and others.
“Bala Sanga was once there, he was once the investigator and prosecutor at the identical time.
“Bala Sanga used to be the one who used to be inducing the 2nd defendant (Abubakar). He used to be the one pronouncing convey this man in, convey that one in,” he said.
The senior attorney argued that Sanga, who doubled as investigator and prosecutor, must have been in the court docket to clear all doubts.
Olanipukun insisted that his client was coerced to make the statements.
He, therefore, prayed the court to dismiss the EFCC’s argument and uphold Abubakar’s no-case submission.
Chief Kanu Agabi, SAN, who appeared for Adoke (1st defendant), also aligned with Olanipekun’s submission.
Counsel to the anti-corruption commission, Offem Uket, disagreed with Olanipekun.
Uket argued that during the trial-within-trial, it was revealed that Abubakar’s lawyer was always present when the statements were taking.
The lawyer, who said Abubakar was neither induced nor forced to make the statements, urged the court to dismiss the no-case submission.
Justice Ekwo adjourned the matter until Dec. 12 for ruling on the no-case submission.
The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that Abubakar, while being led in evidence as defence witness in the trial-within-trial on July 19, told the court that Sanga, an EFCC officer threatened him to indict former President Goodluck Jonathan in alleged money laundering suit.
He also alleged that the officer threatened him to indict the ex-minister and former Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF), Adoke.
NAN reports that Adoke was the Minister of Justice during President Jonathan’s administration between April 6, 2010 and April 29, 2015.
NAN also reports that Aminu Lawal, the second prosecution witness in the trial-within-trial, had, on May 10, said that Abubakar was neither enforced to make statements nor induced to implicate others in the course of the investigation, and that he was never threatened to be detained.
Lawal was part of the investigators who took the defendant’s statements on Dec. 31, 2019 and on Jan. 6, 2020.
But Abubakar, a business mogul, told the judge that the extra-judicial statements he made on Dec. 31, 2019 and on Jan. 6, 2020 were not made voluntarily.
He said on Dec. 31, 2019 when he was invited to the EFCC’s office, Sanga, threatened to detain him if he refused to make extra-judicial statement.
Besides, Abubakar said on Jan. 6, 2022, Sanga, who introduced himself as the new prosecutor in the matter, told him that there was an evidence before him (Sanga) which showed that he (Abubakar) gave the sum of 20 million dollars to Adoke.
Abubakar also told the court that Sanga informed him that there was another evidence which indicated that he
Lawal was part of the investigators who took the defendant’s statements on Dec. 31, 2019 and on Jan. 6, 2020.
But Abubakar, a business mogul, told the judge that the extra-judicial statements he made on Dec. 31, 2019 and on Jan. 6, 2020 were not made voluntarily.
He said on Dec. 31, 2019 when he was invited to the EFCC’s office, Sanga, threatened to detain him if he refused to make extra-judicial statement.
Besides, Abubakar said on Jan. 6, 2022, Sanga, who introduced himself as the new prosecutor in the matter, told him that there was an evidence before him (Sanga) which showed that he (Abubakar) gave the sum of 20 million dollars to Adoke.
Abubakar also told the court that Sanga informed him that there was another evidence which indicated that he
Lawal was part of the investigators who took the defendant’s statements on Dec. 31, 2019 and on Jan. 6, 2020.
But Abubakar, a business mogul, told the judge that the extra-judicial statements he made on Dec. 31, 2019 and on Jan. 6, 2020 were not made voluntarily.
He said on Dec. 31, 2019 when he was invited to the EFCC’s office, Sanga, threatened to detain him if he refused to make extra-judicial statement.
Besides, Abubakar said on Jan. 6, 2022, Sanga, who introduced himself as the new prosecutor in the matter, told him that there was an evidence before him (Sanga) which showed that he (Abubakar) gave the sum of 20 million dollars to Adoke.
Abubakar also told the court that Sanga informed him that there was another evidence which indicated that he
Lawal was part of the investigators who took the defendant’s statements on Dec. 31, 2019 and on Jan. 6, 2020.
But Abubakar, a business mogul, told the judge that the extra-judicial statements he made on Dec. 31, 2019 and on Jan. 6, 2020 were not made voluntarily.
He said on Dec. 31, 2019 when he was invited to the EFCC’s office, Sanga, threatened to detain him if he refused to make extra-judicial statement.
Besides, Abubakar said on Jan. 6, 2022, Sanga, who introduced himself as the new prosecutor in the matter, told him that there was an evidence before him (Sanga) which showed that he (Abubakar) gave the sum of 20 million dollars to Adoke.
Abubakar also told the court that Sanga informed him that there was another evidence which indicated that he
